In determining whether a
transaction involves gratuitous transfer that is subject to donor’s tax under
Section 98 of the Tax Code, not only the legal documents, but also other
external factors surrounding the transactions are considered. Thus, in case
where a request to include or affix the names of minor children as transferees,
in addition to the parents who are the original buyers, in the Certificate
Authorizing Registration (CAR), the BIR shall look into the true intent of the
parties to the transaction to determine its liability to donor’s tax.
In the instant case, it was
alleged that there was no transfer of property from the parent to their
children since they do not own the subject property, hence, the inclusion of
their names in the CAR is not subject to donor’s tax. Moreover, it was claimed
that the minor children used their allowance, which came from their parents, to
purchase the properties.
In its decision, the CTA held
that there is a clear “animus donandi” or intent to give when the names of
minor children who are not earning any income are included in the CAR and
certificate of titles of the property. It held that while it is true that minor
children can save money from their allowances and buy properties from their savings,
considering the children’s age and the price of property, the children will not
be able to save a substantial amount, even if they receive enormous allowances from
the parents. Moreover, it is highly unlikely for an individual to own real property
at such an early age and without a source of income; thus the CTA deemed the
transaction to be a donation.
(Hordon H. Evono and Maribel C. Evono v. Department of
Finance, CIR and the Republic of the Philippines, CTA EB No. 705 re CTA Case
No. 7573, June 4, 2012)
Tax Brief - July 2012
Punongbayan and Araullo
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento