Outsourcing
of internal audit (IA) activities is a decision that an organization may face
when dynamic market conditions require it to focus on core business
functions and leverage on the expertise of service providers to perform
support services and other non-core activities. When faced with that decision, business leaders
should consider the following pros and cons:
The
Pros
Increased
independent assurance.
Increased
assurance of independence and objectivity is the primary driver for outsourcing
internal audit activities. For critical engagements with results affecting the
performance evaluation of people in the organization, e.g., fraud audits or
business process reviews, outsourced internal auditors are in the best position
to provide objective results because they are not reporting administratively
within the organization. Thus, the risk of familiarity and intimidation threats
affecting internal audit independence is reduced.
Bang for
your buck. Another value proposition
of internal audit service providers is the ability to provide the organization
with qualified and highly-trained personnel without the costs associated with
hiring and maintaining them in the company. The service providers have access
to best-in-class practices across industries as they combine expertise acquired
from their various clients. Service providers are also exposed to the latest
advances in technology and often have access to comprehensive knowledge bases
that in-house internal audit operations do not have.
The cost
of hiring, training, and certifying auditors, along with the benefits due them
and staff retention programs typically amount to 35 to 45 percent of salary
rates. These costs are avoided when an organization opts to outsource. In
addition, service providers that specialize in internal audit outsourcing
perform more efficiently due to experience and expertise.
The
Cons
Brain drain. Although organizations benefit from the
specialized skills, best-in-class practices, and reduced costs associated with outsourced
internal audit, the organization may be exposed to risk of diminishing
operational knowledge and institutional memory. Internal audit is one area
where organizational milestones and key management decisions are monitored and
evaluated. It is also one avenue for developing talent internally by exposing employees
to different aspects of the company’s operations. To mitigate this risk, key people
in the organization should be updated and involved in internal audit
activities. This will ensure that the people are apprised of the latest
concepts in effective internal control practices and will also increase their
sense of ownership for controls under their accountability. Throughout the outsourcing
of internal audit activities, the organization and the provider should draw up
an agreed-upon documentation protocol to chronicle all the key takeaways in the
course of the engagement.
Moral
hazards. While
outsourcing’s primary boon is enabling the organization to focus on core
activities, moral hazards may arise. Process and control owners may tend to
transfer the responsibility of implementing positive quality management changes
to the outsourced internal auditors. As such, key personnel should be actively
involved and invested in ensuring that recommended changes are successfully effected.
Through continuous monitoring and review of the internal audit activity within
the organization, it is ensured that the outsourced internal audit function is
directed towards value creation.
Governance
is yours
Although
outsourcing poses some challenges, it can be an effective strategy to allow an organization
to focus on core activities while benefiting from the expertise of a service provider.
It must be remembered, however, that while an organization can outsource some aspects
of its operations, oversight and ultimate responsibility cannot be passed on to
others. Should an organization decide to outsource its internal audit
functions, its oversight and governance bodies must actively participate in the
planning, monitoring, and review of internal audit activities. Management
should also take ownership of the execution of controls and mitigation of
business risks.
Deanna Kaye Mallari CPA is an Associate Consultant with the Advisory
Services Division of Punongbayan & Araullo.
Executive Brief –
November 2012
Punongbayan and Araullo
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento