Martes, Agosto 27, 2013

Proper remedy in contesting LBT assessment

Under Section 195 of the Local Government Code (LGC), if a taxpayer is dissatisfied with a local treasurer’s denial of his protest or if there is no action regarding his protest over an assessment, the taxpayer has 30 days within which to appeal to the court of competent jurisdiction.

The CTA held that the wordings of Section 195 of the LGC is plain, unequivocal and mandatory that the taxpayer “shall” have 30 days, reckoned from the taxpayer’s receipt of the denial of his protest, within which to appeal the denial with the court of competent jurisdiction.  Otherwise, the assessment shall become final and unappealable.

Instead of filing an appeal with the court of competent jurisdiction (i.e., Regional Trial Court) within the 30-day period after receiving the LGU’s denial of its protest with finality, the taxpayer wrote a letter to the office of the treasurer reiterating its stand that it is not subject to local business tax (LBT). It was after receiving the notices of seizure, garnishment and warrant of levy that the taxpayer filed a petition with the court for the issuance of temporary restraining order against the notices for the collection of its unpaid LBT.

The CTA ruled that since no appeal was filed by the taxpayer to the court within the 30-day period provided under Section 195 of the LGC, the assessment for LBT had become conclusive and appealable.

Considering that the taxpayer failed to assail the validity of its LBT assessment by filing a timely appeal with the court, the taxpayer lost its right to question the validity of the assessment, and consequently, it could not seek judicial action to enjoin the concerned LGU in enforcing the collection of its unpaid LBT through the civil remedies provided under the LGC.

(Benguet Electric Cooperative v. Municipality of La Trinidad, Benguet and Municipal Treasurer, CTA AC No. 85, June 7, 2013)
Tax Brief – July 2013

Punongbayan and Araullo

Linggo, Agosto 25, 2013

Classification of real estate service practitioners for withholding tax purposes

Income derived by a licensed real estate practitioner (real estate consultant, real estate appraisers and real estate brokers) in his practice of profession shall be considered professional fee subject to 15% creditable withholding tax (CWT) if his gross income for the current year exceeds P720,000, and 10% if otherwise under Section 2.57.2(A)(1) of RR 2-98, as amended.

In the case of real estate service practitioners (RESPs) who failed or did not take up the licensure examination given by the Real Estate Service and are not registered with the Real Estate Service under the Professional Regulations Commission (PRC), their income shall be subject to 10% CWT under Section 2.57.2(G) of RR 2-98, as amended.

The 10% or 10%/15% withholding tax rates shall apply to income payments paid or payable to real estate practitioners starting June 1, 2013.

(Revenue Regulations No. 10-2013, June 6, 2013)
Tax Brief – July 2013
Punongbayan and Araullo


Miyerkules, Agosto 21, 2013

Submission of BIR Form 2316 to the BIR

The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) has required all employers to submit the duplicate copy of BIR Form 2316 (Certificate of Compensation Payment/Tax Withheld) of their employees who are qualified for substituted filing to the BIR.

Under Section 2.83 of Revenue Regulations No. (RR) 2-98, as amended, every employer is required to furnish its employees (including minimum wage earners) BIR Form 2316 on or before January 31 of the succeeding calendar year, or if employment is terminated before the close of such calendar year, on the day on which last payment of compensation is made. Failure to furnish BIR Form 2316 shall be grounds for the mandatory audit of payor’s income tax liabilities (including withholding tax) upon verified complaint of the payee.

In addition to the requirement to furnish BIR Form 2316 to employees, the BIR now requires that all employers submit the duplicate copy of BIR Form 2316 to the BIR not later than February 28 following the close of the calendar year. Failure to submit/file BIR Form 2316 on or before February 28 following the close of the calendar year will merit a penalty of P1,000 for each failure, or a maximum amount of P25,000 for all such failures during a calendar year.

In case the employer fails to comply with the filing or submission of BIR Form 2316 for two consecutive years, the employer shall be liable to a fine in the amount of P10,000 and suffer imprisonment of not less than one year but not more than 10 years upon conviction, in accordance with Section 255 of the Tax Code.

This is in addition to other penalties provided by law. In settlement, a compromise fee of P1,000 for each BIR Form 2316 not filed without any maximum threshold shall be collected by the BIR.

(Revenue Regulations No. 11-2013, June 6, 2013)
Tax Brief – July 2013
Punongbayan and Araullo

Lunes, Agosto 5, 2013

ATP work-around procedures

The BIR issued the following policies and procedures in the processing of Authority to Print (ATP) on Official Receipts (ORs), Sales Invoices (SIs) and Commercial Invoices (CIs) in the interim period until the availability of the online ATP system.

Policies
The requirement to secure a new ATP using the online ATP system covers all taxpayers engaged in business, government or private, using manually-issued receipts/invoices, and loose-leaf receipts/invoices. Taxpayers using receipts/invoices issued through Cash Register Machine (CRM)/Point-of-Sale (POS) Machines and/or Computerized Accounting System (CAS) shall be regulated in a separate revenue issuance.

Only BIR accredited printers shall be authorized to print principal and supplementary invoices. Printers that were issued provisional accreditation numbers shall also be allowed to print principal and supplementary receipts/invoices.

In the interim, i.e., until the online ATP system becomes available, all applications for ATP, together with the necessary documentary requirements, shall be submitted to the Revenue District Office (RDO)/Large Taxpayer Office (LT Office) having jurisdiction over the Head Office (HO) of the taxpayer-applicant. The principal and supplementary receipts and invoices of the HO and each of the branches shall have its own independent series of serial number.

A taxpayer with expiring principal and supplementary receipts/invoices shall apply for a new ATP not later than 60 days prior to the actual expiry date.

In the filing of application, the old BIR Form No. 1906 shall still be used until the revised form becomes available. The ATP shall be processed using the registration system of the Integrated Tax System (ITS), which shall generate the prescribed ATP. The issued ATP shall be printed on the inside back portion of the cardboard cover of each booklet/pad of the principal and supplementary receipts/ invoices printed.

Aside from the information required to be indicated under existing regulations in ORs/SIs/CIs — such as taxpayer’s registered name, address and TIN of the buyer, etc. — the bottom part of the ORs/SIs/CIs shall contain information such as the Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) of senior citizens and persons with disability (PWD) (for taxpayers transacting with senior citizens and PWDs), printer’s accreditation number, and the phrase “This invoice/receipt shall be valid for five (5) years from the date of the ATP”. (For sample format of principal and supplementary receipts/invoices, check the Annexes of the RMO 12-2013).

All new set/s of principal and supplementary receipts/invoices to be printed that are compliant with the requirements set forth under this Order shall have a validity period of five years. All unused/expired/expiring ORs/SIs/CIs shall be surrendered together with an inventory listing to the BIR Office having jurisdiction over the taxpayer for destruction on or before the 10th day after the validity period of the expired receipts/invoices.

Filing procedure
A taxpayer applying for new ATP should follow the prescribed procedures below.
1. All taxpayers applying for ATP should submit an inventory listing and surrender the hardcopies of their unused/expired receipts/invoices together with photocopies of the old and new ATPs and corresponding Printer’s Certificate of Delivery (PCD) to the RDO where they are registered. Branch office/s shall submit and surrender the same to the RDO/LT Office concerned where the branch is registered.
2. The taxpayer should choose the BIR Accredited Printer from the updated list of duly accredited printers available in the BIR website.
3. The taxpayer, or his authorized representative, should file the application for ATP with the following supporting documents at the RDO/LT Office concerned where the Head Office is registered using BIR Form 1906:
a. Original copy of sample layout/template of OR/SI/CI
b. Original Printer’s Job Order c. Photocopy of previous ATP. If not available, the last series of the printed OR/SI/CI. New set of receipts/ invoices shall continue with the last serial number indicated in the previous ATP issued. However, for printing machines with limited capacity as to the maximum range of serial numbers, the serial number may start from one (1) and prefixed with a special/alpha code to avoid duplication (e.g., A0001)
d. Photocopy of Loose-leaf Permit, if applicable
4. Finally, the taxpayer should sign in the office logbook as proof of actual receipt of the approved ATP.

Transitory rules
All unused/unissued principal and supplementary receipts/invoices printed prior to January 19, 2013 (effectivity of RR 18-2012) and those printed by printers that are not compliant with the Order shall be valid until June 30, 2013.

An inventory listing of its unused/unissued principal and supplementary receipts/invoices should be submitted while the hardcopies of the receipts/invoices should be surrendered by the taxpayer on or before July 10, 2013.

Branch office/s shall submit and surrender the same to the concerned RDO/LT Office where the branch is registered.

(Revenue Memorandum Order No. 12-2013, May 3, 2013)
Tax Brief – June 2013
Punongbayan and Araullo


Martes, Hulyo 30, 2013

Implementing Rules and Regulations of Foster Child Act (RA 10165)

The BIR has circularized the full text of the Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of Republic Act No. (RA) 10165 (Foster Child Act of 2012), which provides the guidelines and procedures, among others, for availing of the tax incentives granted to foster parents and other participants of the foster care program under the law.

Pertinent provisions of the regulations implementing the tax incentives under the law are as follows:

On the treatment of foster child as dependent
The definition of the term “dependent”, under Section 35(B) of the National Internal Revenue Code of 1997 (NIRC), shall be amended to include a “foster child”. Hence, a foster shall be allowed to claim a foster child as qualified dependent subject to the following conditions:
a) A foster parent shall be allowed an additional exemption of P25,000 for each qualified dependent provided that the total number of dependents, including a foster child, qualified to be claimed as a dependent for which additional exemptions may be claimed shall not exceed four, as provided for by RA 9504.
b) The P25,000 additional exemption for a foster child shall be allowed only if the period of foster care is a continuous period of at least one taxable year.
c) Only one foster parent can treat the foster child as a dependent for a particular taxable year. As such, no other parent or foster parent can claim the said child as dependent for that period.

On tax incentives to accredited childcaring or child-placing institutions
Any child-caring or child-placing institution licensed and accredited by the Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) to implement the foster care program shall be exempt from income tax on income derived by it as such an organization pursuant to Section 30 of the NIRC . The same agency may also apply as a qualified donee institution.

On the tax incentives to donors of accredited child-caring or child-placing institutions
Donors of child-caring or child-placing institutions that are licensed and accredited by the DSWD shall be exempt from donor’s tax under Section 101 of the Tax Code provided that not more than 30% of the amount of donations shall be spent for administrative expenses. They shall also be granted allowable deductions from their gross income to the extent of their donation in accordance with Section 34(H) of the NIRC.

Through the BIR, the Department of Finance shall issue within one month from the issuance of the IRR the appropriate regulations and circular on the tax incentives for foster care program under RA 10165.

(Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 41-2013, May 16, 2013)
Tax Brief – June 2013

Punongbayan and Araullo

Linggo, Hulyo 28, 2013

Estate Planning made simple

Estate planning made simple

By Jules E. Riego
DEATH is almost always unplanned but an event that we should all prepare for, whether we believe in an afterlife or not. Hell, after all, is not just a spiritual concept, but an unfortunate reality that heirs of a decedent usually experience when there is no plan for the settlement of his or her estate and for the payment of taxes that will fall due from the transfer of assets to the heirs.
After hearing numerous horror stories from heirs left behind by a person who, almost always, died suddenly, the top two problems in such a situation are (1) liquidity, that is, where to get the money to pay the local transfer tax (LTT) and estate tax due; and (2) securing a new Transfer Certificate of Title and/or tax declarations for the heirs when there are real properties involved.
Do you know that while the bereaved are still grieving, heirs already have to pay the LTT due from the estate within 60 days from the death of the decedent? On the surface, the LTT might look small, with a maximum rate of 75% of 1% of the fair market value of the real estate assets involved in an estate, but the common problem is that heirs point to each other to foot the bill. This results in delays in payment, with corresponding penalties and interests.
The estate tax return, on the other hand, must be filed within six months from the death of the decedent and, ideally, the estate tax must have already been paid at that time. However, if paying the tax will bring undue hardship to the heirs, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue may extend payment for two years in case of extrajudicial settlement of the estate. Extrajudicial settlement means that the decedent died without a last will and testament and that the heirs, in accordance with law, decided to execute a partition agreement as to how they will divide the estate among themselves.
In case the decedent died with a last will and testament, a probate of the will has to be done. This means that a case in court has to be instituted by the heirs where the validity of the last will and testament should be proven. In this case, the Commissioner may grant an extension of five years within which to pay the tax.
However, time and again, the heirs are often forced to do a fire sale of prime properties and assets from the estate just to settle the LTT and estate tax due. As prime properties are the easiest to sell, these are sold at bargain prices just to avoid paying the 25% surcharge and 20% interest per annum imposed on the late payment of estate tax.
Preserving peace and harmony among heirs would be ideal. More than the wealth to be passed down, maintaining cordial relationships between the heirs should be secured. We often hear the phrase, “that will never happen to our family, we are all at peace with each other.” Yet, just as frequently, I have seen families end up in court engaging each other in costly suits over the partitioning of the estate. One should never assume that your heirs will live happily ever after when your time is up. I would rather go by this saying, “Blood is thicker than water, but money is thicker than blood.”
With foresight, these unfortunate things can be easily avoided — if one accepts the inevitability of death and plans for it. A few simple tools come to mind that may be considered in addressing the common problems mentioned above:
• Life insurance. The proceeds of a life insurance policy taken out by the decedent upon his own life, which designates the heirs as the irrevocable beneficiary, is not subject to estate tax. Thus, life insurance can address the liquidity problems of heirs. The premiums paid for the life insurance policy is also effectively carved out of the assets of the decedent, and hence, will reduce the taxable estate.
• Sale of Assets. One may just consider selling assets to a potential heir (except a spouse) rather than allowing it to become part of the estate. In particular, the sale of real property that is considered a capital asset will only attract 6% capital gains tax, 1.5% documentary stamp tax and 75% of 1% local transfer tax, compared with estate tax which has a maximum effective rate of 16%. One just has to make sure that the heir who will buy the property has the capacity to buy and will actually purchase the property.
It is interesting to note that selling to a spouse is actually an effective estate tax — saving mechanism recognized in other jurisdictions, such as the United States and the United Kingdom. However, in the Philippines, sale between spouses is allowed only when the husband and wife are under the regime of complete separation of property.
• Donation. If the potential heir has no capacity to buy, one may just donate the property. Donor’s tax has a maximum effective rate of 12.5%, which is still lower than the maximum effective estate tax rate of 16.5%. The amount or value of the asset donation is also already carved out from the estate, reducing the taxable estate. Please note, however, that if you donate to a stranger (that is, someone who is not your brother or sister, ancestor or lineal descendant or first cousin), the donor’s tax goes up to 30%.
Interestingly, one question that some people ask is how they can exclude sons-in-law and/or daughters-in-law from inheriting the property that their own children will receive upon their demise. Strangely, some people worry that they might be working too hard for their in-laws. How then do you address this practical problem?
One way is through the execution of a last will and testament. At least, for assets pertaining to the free portion, one may impose conditions as to who, when, and how succession will take place with respect to those assets. The free portion is the part of the estate that a testator may dispose freely to anybody he wants to, after the legitime of the compulsory heirs has been served. Legitime is the minimum entitlement of each compulsory heir under the law and which cannot be made subject to any condition or imposition whatsoever. Compulsory heirs are heirs who will inherit from us whether we like them or not, e.g., spouse or children.
Keeping these considerations in mind, it makes sense for one to plan ahead to avoid subjecting one’s heirs to a hellish experience. Remember: Prosperity is a blessing from God, but it can also become a curse if not handled properly.
Jules E. Riego is a principal of SGV & Co.
This article is for general information only and is not a substitute for professional advice where the facts and circumstances warrant. The views and opinion expressed above are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of SGV & Co.

Linggo, Hulyo 21, 2013

Disallowance of expenses not subjected to withholding tax

Disallowance of expenses not subjected to withholding tax 
(Revenue Regulations No. 12-2013)

Pursuant to Section 2.58.5 of Revenue Regulations No. 2-98,  expenses not properly subjected to withholding taxes shall not be allowed as deductible expense for income tax purposes.  However, if the withholding tax, including interest and surcharges,  is paid at the time of audit and investigation, the deduction may still be allowed 

Not anymore.

According to RR 12-2013, no deduction shall be allowed on expenses  even if the withholding tax  due on the failure to withhold on the income payment is made  during the course of the BIR examination.  Thus, if the BIR discovers upon audit  that the required withholding tax on the income payment made was not paid, the concerned taxpayer shall be liable to pay the deficiency withholding tax (including interest and surcharge) and the deficiency income tax as a result of the  disallowed deduction.   

RR 12-2013 was published on July 13, 2013 and 15 days hence, shall be effective on July 28, 2013.