Tax
assessments are presumed correct and made in good faith. The assessments should
not, however, be based on presumptions no matter how reasonable or logical the
presumption might be. In order to withstand the test of judicial scrutiny, the
assessment must be based on actual facts.
In the
instant case, a company engaged in transmission of information was assessed for
undeclared sales. The BIR’s assessment arose from the matching of computer
records using the summary list of purchases submitted by the taxpayer’s customers.
The Court
of Tax Appeals (CTA) held that the BIR’s assessment against the taxpayer cannot
be sustained since the assessment lacks factual basis. The BIR based its
assessment merely on an unverified quarterly list. The CTA maintained that the
summary list of purchases should have been verified with other externally
sourced data in order to check the integrity of the information gathered.
According
to the CTA, even the BIR, in its Revenue Memorandum Order No. (RMO) 04-03,
recognizes the need to verify the amounts reflected in the quarterly summary
list of purchases with other externally sourced data in ascertaining the
taxpayer’s underdeclaration of revenues or overstatement of costs and expenses.
Hence, for
failure to corroborate its assessment with other externally sourced data, the
CTA ordered the cancellation of the deficiency income tax and VAT against the
taxpayer.
(Commissioner of
Internal Revenue v. Fax N Parcel, Incorporated, CTA EB 883 re: CTA Case No.
7415, February 14, 2013)
Tax
Brief – March 2013
Punongbayan
and Araullo
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento